Part 1
Lead reactivation
How your list is checked, ranked and worked — what leaves your side, what never does, and the rules your industry adds.
What we take, where it goes, and who sees it.
For compliance, operations and principals
Lead reactivation works the prospects your firm has already generated — people who asked about your services, were followed up once or twice, and then were not. We rank them by likelihood to book a conversation and work the list from the top, so your advisors spend their time on the people most likely to sit down with them.
Every one of those records is regulated: by Regulation S-P, by your supervisory and recordkeeping rules, and by federal and state telemarketing law. This document sets out, control by control, how the engagement keeps your firm inside those rules — and which decisions stay with your firm. It is written to be read by your Chief Compliance Officer and filed with your vendor due diligence.
Sections 02 to 06 are the plain-English part. They show the whole system in pictures, explain the four things the ranking looks at, and follow one example lead from your CRM to your advisor’s desk. The sections after them are the detail your compliance team will check.
01
Commitments
Ten commitments, before the detail
- 01 · Direct identifiers never reach an AI provider — Names, phone numbers, emails, addresses and account numbers stay in a secure environment. The AI provider sees a random ID and a few short facts, nothing more.
- 02 · Nothing goes out without your approval — Your principal or CCO approves every template before use. Our review sits on top of yours, never in place of it.
- 03 · Every message lands in your archive — Outreach goes through your archived channels, or is captured into your archive as it is sent. Nothing off-channel.
- 04 · No evidenced consent, no text message — Consent, opt-outs, Do Not Call status and quiet hours are checked at the moment of sending. Opt-outs are permanent.
- 05 · Your data serves your engagement only — No model training, no reuse across clients, no sale, no outside enrichment without your written instruction.
- 06 · Breach notice within 72 hours — As soon as possible and no later than 72 hours — the window Regulation S-P requires your firm to put in our contract.
- 07 · Return and destruction, certified — At the end of the engagement your data, including the identity key, is returned or destroyed, and we confirm it in writing.
- 08 · No investment advice — Messages invite a conversation with your advisor. No recommendations, performance figures, projections or testimonials.
- 09 · A fee structure your compliance team chooses — A flat fee or a results-based fee, with how each is treated under your rules set out in section 14.
- 10 · Evidence on request — Every control here has something you can inspect. We complete your due diligence questionnaire during onboarding.
02
The whole picture
The system on one page
The system works in three zones. Names and contact details stay on your side. Our scoring works only with a random ID and a few short facts. The results come back to your side, where your firm approves and sends.
G1 — the agreement and intake review — clears before any data moves. G7 covers retention and destruction.
Dashed gold-edged boxes, marked G1 to G7, are compliance gates. Nothing passes a gate until it clears. Section 03 lists what each one checks.
03
Step by step
From our first conversation to the first message
Seventeen steps in five phases. The gate marks show where a compliance check has to clear before the work moves on.
Onboard (before any data)
- 01 First conversation — How your firm works with prospects today
- 02 Agreement — Roles, purpose, subprocessors, 72-hour notice
G1 - 03 Intake review — Lead sources, consent wording, opt-outs
G1 - 04 Secure environment — In your environment, or our workstation
Prepare (on your side)
- 05 Map your stages — Your CRM statuses to eight shared stages
- 06 Check the list — Opt-outs, Do Not Call, clients, complaints
G2 - 07 Swap names for IDs — A random ID; the key stays with you
- 08 Notes into facts — Fixed-list answers; figures become tiers
G3
Rank (Tez scoring)
- 09 Score — Intent, Opening, Reachability, Fit
- 10 Tier and reasons — A to D, with the top reasons
- 11 Short summary — Why call, and an opening line, checked
G4 - 12 Next step — Channel by consent, and timing
Act (on your side)
- 13 Match back — The ranked list appears in your CRM
- 14 Your approval — Principal or CCO approves the wording
G5 - 15 Send — Re-checked at sending; through your archive
G6
Learn (ongoing)
- 16 Record outcomes — Booked, held, signed; a held-back group
- 17 Improve and report — Your ranking only; results you can check
G7
| Gate | When | What has to be true to pass | Who decides |
|---|---|---|---|
| G1 | Before any data | Signed agreement; your lead sources, consent wording and opt-out records reviewed; your registration type and fee model confirmed | Your firm and Tez |
| G2 | As the list arrives | Opt-outs, Do Not Call, existing clients, complaints and anyone hostile are set aside and never ranked | Software, on your rules |
| G3 | Before anything leaves your side | Only approved facts cross: no names, contact details, notes, exact figures or exact dates | Software, checked by Tez |
| G4 | After a summary is drafted | No personal data, no banned topics, nothing the facts do not support | Software, then your advisor |
| G5 | Before any outreach | Your principal or CCO approves the wording and the batch | Your firm |
| G6 | At the moment of sending | Consent for that channel, Do Not Call, quiet hours in the lead’s time zone, opt-outs | Software, on your channels |
| G7 | Throughout, and at the end | Outcomes kept by random ID, used for your firm only, returned or destroyed at termination | Tez, certified to you |
04
The ranking
How the list is put in order
Every lead is checked first, then looked at through four factors. The factors combine into one score, and the list is sorted by it. The sorting is plain arithmetic, not an AI model, so every score can be explained in a sentence.
| Factor | The question it answers | What it looks at, for an advisory firm |
|---|---|---|
| Intent | How serious were they, and how long ago? | How far they got: inquiry, intro call, discovery meeting, plan presented. Time since the last real conversation. Whether they replied before. How many follow-ups have already been tried. |
| Opening | Is there a real reason to get back in touch? | The reason they paused: timing, a spouse, fees, another firm. A condition they named, such as “after the business sale closes.” Whether that moment has now passed. |
| Reachability | Can we reach them, and are we allowed to? | A working email or phone. Consent on file for each channel. Do Not Call status, and whether the three-month inquiry window has passed. |
| Fit | Can your firm still serve them? | A state you are registered in. Whether they meet your account minimum, as a yes or no only. Whether they want a service your advisors offer. |
How the ranking gets better
- 01It starts from your team’s experience — Your advisors tell us how often each kind of paused prospect comes back. Those estimates set the first odds. Until your results come in, the scores are educated estimates, and we say so.
- 02It corrects itself from your results — As meetings are booked, held or declined, the odds for each reason move toward what actually happened at your firm.
- 03It becomes a model of your firm alone — After about 300 recorded outcomes, the ranking is fitted to your firm’s results. It is never trained on, or pooled with, another firm’s data.
- 04A held-back group keeps us honest — With your agreement, about one lead in ten is held back and not contacted for a set period. Comparing the two groups shows what the outreach actually changed, rather than what would have happened anyway.
05
A worked example
One lead, from your CRM to your advisor
Karen Mills is fictional. Her record is shaped like a real one. Follow it through the four cards, left to right and top to bottom.
1 · Your CRM record (stays with you)
| Field | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| name | Karen Mills | key table |
| phone | (713) 555-0148 | key table |
| karen.m@example.com | key table | |
| CRM ID | 0035e00000Qx7 | key table |
| status | Need to think about it | becomes a stage |
| note | Wants to wait until her 401(k) rollover clears in March | becomes facts |
| assets | $412,000 | becomes a tier |
| last contact | March 14, 2026 | becomes days |
2 · What we receive (leaves your side)
| Field | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| ID | s_7Qx9mK2a | random |
| stage | Plan presented | Intent |
| days since | 203 | Intent |
| reason | Timing | Opening |
| condition | Yes, waiting on an event | Opening |
| reach | Email yes · text no consent | Reachability |
| fit | Registered state yes · minimum yes | Fit |
| value tier | 2 of 3, only if you opt in | optional |
Never leaves your side: her name, phone, email, CRM ID, the note itself, the asset figure, exact dates.
3 · What comes back (back to you)
| Field | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| ID | s_7Qx9mK2a | |
| score | 71 · tier A | |
| reasons | + named a condition · + plan presented · − 203 days since contact | |
| reason line | Plan presented; paused for an event that should have passed. | fixed wording |
| summary | She paused until something she was waiting on cleared in March. That has likely passed. A good opener is to ask whether it went through. | AI, checked |
| next step | Email, Tuesday afternoon her time |
4 · In your CRM (stays with you)
| Field | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| record | Karen Mills · tier A · 71 | matched back |
| fields | Reason line, summary and next step added to her record | |
| draft | “Hi {first_name}, …” with her name filled in only at sending | placeholder |
| flags | Text blocked, no consent · Do Not Call check required | G6 |
No text consent on file, so the next step is email. Her inquiry is over three months old, so a Do Not Call check comes before any call. Her advisor sees her name here, in your own CRM, for the first time.
- 01Her note became a few facts — “401(k) rollover” left only as “waiting on an event.” If your CCO approves a short list of event types, the summary can be more specific without the note ever leaving.
06
The suggestion
How the “why call” note is written and checked
Each lead comes back with a reason line in fixed wording and a short summary drafted by an AI model, both written only from the facts in card 2 of section 05. The AI writes; it does not decide. The order comes from arithmetic, and your firm approves anything sent.
The four checks at gate G4
- No personal data — The draft may not contain a name, number, email or address. Names appear only as a placeholder, filled in on your side at sending.
- No advice, no promises — No recommendations, performance figures, projections, rates or guarantees. The draft invites a conversation with your advisor, nothing more.
- Nothing made up — Every statement in the summary must trace back to one of the facts it was given. A statement that does not is treated as a failure.
- Your never-say list — Phrases and topics your firm rules out are blocked, on top of the general rules above.
07
Roles
Your firm stays the covered institution
Under Regulation S-P your firm is the covered institution and Tez I Solutions is a service provider. You share consumer information with us under the service-provider exception (17 CFR 248.13), on a contract that limits our use of it to this engagement; the reuse and redisclosure limits in 248.11 then bind us. Prospects who asked about your services but never opened an account are consumers under the rule, so the dormant list is covered in full. Since the 2024 amendments, your incident response program must include written oversight of service providers. This is how responsibility divides.
| Obligation | Your firm | Tez I Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Privacy notices and opt-outs | Owns | Honours your suppression and opt-out lists |
| Approval of communications | Principal or CCO approves before use | Submits templates; never alters approved wording |
| Supervision | Owns, under FINRA Rule 3110 or your compliance program | Keeps the draft, approved version and approver for every template |
| Books and records | Owns the archive | Sends only through it, or captures into it |
| How leads were obtained | Warrants it in the agreement | Records the consent source and enforces it at send time |
| Security of data we hold | Oversees | Operates the controls in sections 10 and 11 |
| Breach notice to customers | Owns, within 30 days | Notifies you within 72 hours and supports the investigation |
| Vendor due diligence | Performs and documents | Completes questionnaires and supplies evidence |
| Access and deletion requests | Receives and instructs | Executes within your deadline and confirms |
| Return or destruction | Instructs | Executes and certifies in writing |
08
Data
What we take, and what we never take
The least data that lets the list be ranked and worked. Where a figure carries signal, we keep a tier and drop the figure.
| Data | How it is handled | Reaches the AI model |
|---|---|---|
| Name, phone, email, postal address | Held only in the encrypted key table on your side; used to address a message when it is sent. | No |
| Account numbers, SSN, date of birth, tax and government IDs | Excluded from the export. If one appears in a note, the record is quarantined and the value removed. | No |
| Assets, account values, income, net worth | Only if your compliance team agrees: turned into a three-level tier on your side, used for ranking. An account minimum becomes a yes or no. The figure never leaves. | No |
| Inquiry and contact dates | Converted to intervals — “14 months since last contact.” | Interval only |
| Lead source, stage, status, advisor | Kept as categories; advisor names replaced with codes. | As categories |
| Call and relationship notes | Read on your side and turned into fixed-list answers (section 09). The note itself never leaves. | Fixed-list answers only |
| Consent records and opt-outs | Kept as an append-only history and enforced at send time. | No |
| Holdings, transactions, custodian data; age, gender, ethnicity, health | Not requested, not used to rank, not sent. | No |
09
The privacy layer
Where AI sits, and what it sees
| Station | What happens | Holds or sees |
|---|---|---|
| 01 · Your firm — Your CRM | Full records stay here. Only the agreed fields are read. | Holds: everything, as today |
| 02 · Secure env. — Separation, and notes into facts | A local model with no outside connection answers fixed questions about each note. The key lives only here. | Holds: identifiers, key table, notes |
| 03 · Tez scoring — Ranking, then a short summary | Ranking is arithmetic in our own code. Anthropic’s Claude words a summary from the facts. | Sees: random ID, fixed-list facts |
| 04 · Your channels — Approved, then sent | Names filled in on your side; consent checked; sent through your archive. | Holds: the message, as a firm record |
Notes are the most sensitive part of a record and the most useful. So they are read where they already are, and only short answers leave. Five layers make sure of it.
| Layer | What it does |
|---|---|
| 1 · Field allow-list | Only approved columns are read. Structured identifiers are separated by rule, not by a model’s judgement. |
| 2 · Identifiers stripped first | Phone numbers, emails, account and card numbers, Social Security numbers, dollar amounts and dates are removed from a note before the local model reads it. |
| 3 · Fixed questions, fixed answers | The local model answers set questions — why they paused, whether they named a condition, which kind of event — by choosing from a list your CCO has seen. It cannot write free text. |
| 4 · Unsure means a person decides | An answer the model is not confident about is not guessed. The record is held for a person to review. The process fails closed. |
| 5 · Final scan | Every record is scanned again before it leaves. A record carrying anything outside the approved fields is held back, not sent. |
10
Where it runs
Two ways to run the secure environment
The secure environment is where identifiable data lives during the engagement, and your firm chooses where it sits. In both options the key table never leaves it, and the AI provider receives only a random ID and fixed-list facts.
| Inside your environment | On a Tez-operated workstation | |
|---|---|---|
| Where raw data sits | Your infrastructure; it never leaves your perimeter | An encrypted workstation operated by Tez, in a separate encrypted volume per firm |
| Access | You control it. We use a named, least-privilege account you can revoke at any time | One named individual, with multi-factor authentication |
| Network | Your controls | Outbound limited to the AI provider and your sending channels |
| Logging | Your logging stack | Access log kept for the engagement, provided on request |
| Suits | Firms with an IT team or managed IT provider | Firms without capacity to host it |
Workstation standard, when Tez operates it
- Encrypted at rest — Full-disk encryption, plus a separate encrypted volume for each firm’s data.
- Dedicated and locked down — An OS account used only for client data, multi-factor sign-in, screen lock, current patches, endpoint protection.
- No cloud sync — Client data is never stored in a synced folder or consumer cloud backup, and is excluded from sync by configuration.
- Wiped at the end — The firm’s volume is destroyed at termination and the destruction certified in writing.
11
Security and incidents
The controls, and what happens if one fails
| Control | Evidence you can ask for |
|---|---|
| Written information security program, modelled on Massachusetts 201 CMR 17.00 | The program document |
| Encryption in transit and at rest | Configuration record |
| Multi-factor authentication on every account that touches your data | Account inventory |
| Access limited to named individuals, reviewed quarterly | Access list and review log |
| Access to your data logged | Log extract |
| Background check for anyone with access, on your request | Written confirmation |
| Raw data held only for the life of the engagement | Retention schedule |
| Return or destruction within 30 days of termination | Signed certificate |
| Cyber liability insurance, where your contract requires it | Certificate of insurance |
| Written incident response plan, reviewed each year | The plan and its last review |
If something goes wrong
- 01 · Contain — Stop sending, revoke the affected credential, isolate the system.
- 02 · Notify you within 72 hours at the latest — Which records and fields, what window, what we have done. Updates follow as we investigate.
- 03 · Preserve evidence — Logs, send records and the consent history are kept intact for your investigation.
- 04 · Support your notice, never pre-empt it — Customer notice is your firm’s decision, within 30 days under Regulation S-P. We never contact your customers about it.
12
Supervision and records
Your supervisory system covers this work
Outsourcing does not outsource responsibility (FINRA Notice 21-29), and an AI-drafted message is still your firm’s communication (Notice 24-09). With the SEC’s AI proposal withdrawn as of June 17, 2025, these existing rules are the standard.
- 01Broker-dealers — FINRA Rule 2210 — A template used with more than 25 retail investors in 30 days is a retail communication, approved by your registered principal before use. Individual replies are correspondence, reviewed under your Rule 3110(b) procedures.
- 02Investment advisers — the Marketing Rule — Outreach offering your services may be an advertisement under Rule 206(4)-1; your CCO classifies and approves each template before use.
- 03Content limits — No performance figures, projections, testimonials, guarantees or product recommendations — only a fair, balanced invitation to talk to an advisor.
- 04Every message is a firm record — Exchange Act Rule 17a-4 and FINRA Rule 4511; Advisers Act Rule 204-2. Every message, outbound and inbound, goes through or is captured into the archive you already use.
- 05An approval trail you can produce — For every template: the AI draft, the approved wording, who approved it and when.
- 06Rails the drafting stops at — Identity, account specifics, complaints and anything that reads as advice go to your advisor. Outreach never asks a lead to confirm personal or account details (Regulation S-ID). Every AI draft passes gate G4 before your principal sees it (section 06).
13
Consent
No evidenced consent, no text message
Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act the party that sends a message can be liable for it directly. So consent is enforced in software at the moment of sending, not left to policy.
- 01 · A consent history, not a checkbox — Each lead’s consent is an append-only record of source, wording, channel and date. Contactability is derived from it, never overwritten.
- 02 · Checked when the message sends — Consent, suppression, Do Not Call and quiet hours are rechecked at sending, not at list-building. Yesterday’s opt-out holds today.
- 03 · Aged leads without evidenced consent — Email, or your advisors directly — not text. An inquiry over three months old is no established business relationship for Do Not Call.
- 04 · Do Not Call and reassigned numbers — Checked against the National Do Not Call Registry and the FCC Reassigned Numbers Database. Results dated and stored.
- 05 · Quiet hours and state law — 8am to 9pm in the lead’s local time, narrower where required. Florida, Oklahoma, Maryland, Washington and Texas SB 140 rules applied by state.
- 06 · Opt-out everywhere, permanently — STOP, a request in any words, or one made to your advisor is honoured on every channel and survives any re-import. Email unsubscribes within 10 business days.
14
How we are paid
Two fee models, and how each is treated
We offer two models. Fees are set in conversation and are not in this document. What belongs here is how each model is treated under the rules that apply to your firm, so your compliance team can choose with that in view.
Model A: Flat monthly fee
A fixed fee for operating the service. It does not depend on accounts opened, assets brought in or transactions.
- Broker-dealers. The payment is not transaction-based, which supports your firm’s determination under FINRA Rule 2040.
- Investment advisers. We operate your outreach rather than endorse your firm, and the fee is not paid per client referred.
- The simplest model to approve, document and supervise.
Model B: Results-based fee
A share of revenue attributed to reactivated leads, measured from your CRM’s own records.
- Broker-dealers. A fee that depends on accounts or transactions is transaction-based. FINRA Rule 2040 and Exchange Act section 15(a) bar paying it to an unregistered person whose activity requires registration. Tez I Solutions is not a registered broker-dealer.
- Investment advisers. A fee per new client or a revenue share is likely a compensated promoter arrangement under Rule 206(4)-1: written agreement, disclosure and oversight, and state solicitor rules may apply.
- Offered only where your compliance team and counsel approve the structure in writing.
15
Subprocessors and contract
Who else touches the data, and what we sign
| Subprocessor | What it holds | When |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic (Claude API) | A random ID and fixed-list facts only. No names, contact details, notes or exact figures. Not used for training by default under Anthropic’s commercial terms; zero data retention requested where offered; can run through your own cloud provider instead | Every engagement |
| Your archiving and messaging providers | Messages, as they do today | Every engagement, under your contracts |
| Messaging provider operated by Tez | Phone numbers and message content | Only if you do not send through your own texting channel, and only with real-time capture into your archive |
| Operator console hosting | Named in your agreement, with what it holds | Where your team uses our console |
The full list is an exhibit to your agreement. We give 30 days’ notice before adding or changing a subprocessor.
What the agreement contains
- Roles and purpose — Your firm as covered institution, Tez as service provider; use limited to this engagement, as Regulation S-P 248.13 requires.
- No secondary use — No training, no sale, no reuse across clients, no enrichment without written instruction.
- Security exhibit and 72-hour notice — The controls in sections 09 to 11, as binding terms.
- Consent warranty — Your firm’s representation of how the leads were obtained.
- Privacy requests — Access, correction and deletion within your deadlines, including state privacy laws for data outside the GLBA exemption.
- Audit, return and destruction — Reasonable audit and questionnaire rights; return or certified destruction at termination.
16
Regulatory map
Each rule, and where it is addressed
| Rule | What it requires here | Section |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation S-P, 2024 amendments | Safeguards, incident response, service-provider oversight, 72-hour vendor notice | 09 10 11 |
| Regulation S-P 248.11 and 248.13 | Use limited to the contracted purpose | 07 15 |
| Regulation S-ID | Identity theft red flags | 12 |
| FINRA Rules 2210 and 3110 | Principal approval, content standards, supervision | 07 12 |
| Exchange Act Rule 17a-4, FINRA Rule 4511 | Retention of business communications | 12 |
| FINRA Rule 2040, Exchange Act section 15(a) | No transaction-based pay to unregistered persons | 14 |
| FINRA Notices 21-29 and 24-09 | Vendor oversight; AI under existing rules | 09 11 12 |
| Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-1 | Advertisements and promoters | 12 14 |
| Advisers Act Rules 204-2 and 206(4)-7 | Records; compliance program including vendors | 07 11 12 |
| TCPA and the Do Not Call rules | Consent, revocation, Do Not Call, quiet hours | 13 |
| State telemarketing laws | State consent and calling-hours rules | 13 |
| CAN-SPAM | Unsubscribe, address, accurate headers | 13 |
| Massachusetts 201 CMR 17.00, New York SHIELD Act | Written security program, encryption | 10 11 |
| State comprehensive privacy laws | Access, deletion, no sale, for data outside the GLBA exemption | 15 |
| NIST IR 8053, SP 800-188 | De-identification practice | 08 09 |
17
References
Every requirement, traced to its source
Each commitment in this document rests on a primary source: a statute, a regulation, a rule, a regulator’s own guidance, or a court decision. They are listed here so your compliance team can check our reading against the text. Links were current in October 2026.
| Privacy and data security | Relied on for | Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801–6809 (law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-94) | The federal basis for protecting consumers’ nonpublic personal information | 07 08 |
| Regulation S-P, 17 CFR Part 248, Subpart A (ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-II/part-248) | Service-provider exception (248.13); limits on reuse and redisclosure (248.11); who counts as a consumer | 07 08 15 |
| SEC Release 34-100155, Regulation S-P amendments, May 2024 (sec.gov/files/rules/final/2024/34-100155.pdf) | Incident response program, service-provider oversight, 72-hour vendor notice, 30-day customer notice | 01 07 11 |
| SEC, Regulation S-P Small Entity Compliance Guide, 2024 (sec.gov/files/rules/final/2024/regulation-s-p-small-entity-compliance-guide.pdf) | Plain-language reading of the amended requirements | 07 11 |
| Regulation S-ID, 17 CFR Part 248, Subpart C (ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-II/part-248) | Identity theft red flags; why outreach never asks for personal details | 12 |
| Massachusetts 201 CMR 17.00 (mass.gov/regulations/201-CMR-1700-standards-for-the-protection-of-personal-information-of-ma-residents) | Written security program, encryption on laptops and in transit, service-provider contracts | 10 11 |
| New York SHIELD Act, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law 899-aa and 899-bb | Reasonable safeguards and breach notice for New York residents’ data | 11 |
| California Consumer Privacy Act, Cal. Civ. Code 1798.100 et seq., incl. 1798.145(e) | Data-level GLBA exemption; access, deletion and no-sale duties for data outside it | 15 |
| State privacy law amendments narrowing GLBA exemptions: Oregon, Minnesota, Montana (Oct 2025), Connecticut (Jul 2026) | Why privacy-request handling covers more than GLBA data | 15 |
| Broker-dealers | Relied on for | Sections |
|---|---|---|
| FINRA Rule 2210, Communications with the Public (finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/2210) | Correspondence versus retail communication; principal pre-approval; content standards | 12 |
| FINRA Rule 3110, Supervision (finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/3110) | Review of correspondence; supervision of outsourced work | 07 12 |
| FINRA Rule 4511 and Exchange Act Rule 17a-4, 17 CFR 240.17a-4 (finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/4511) | Retention of every business communication, text messages included | 12 |
| FINRA Rule 2040, Payments to Unregistered Persons (finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/2040) | Why transaction-based fees to an unregistered vendor are restricted | 14 |
| Securities Exchange Act of 1934, section 15(a), 15 U.S.C. 78o(a) | Broker registration standard that Rule 2040 applies | 14 |
| FINRA Regulatory Notice 15-07 (finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/15-07) | FINRA’s guidance on Rule 2040 and the firm’s registration determination | 14 |
| FINRA Regulatory Notice 21-29, Vendor Management and Outsourcing (finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/21-29) | Outsourcing a function does not outsource the firm’s responsibility | 07 12 |
| FINRA Regulatory Notice 24-09, Generative AI (finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/24-09) | Existing rules apply in full when AI drafts a communication | 09 12 |
| FINRA, 2026 Annual Regulatory Oversight Report, December 2025 (finra.org/sites/default/files/2025-12/2026-annual-regulatory-oversight-report.pdf) | Vendor due diligence, vendors’ own use of AI, data return and destruction | 07 11 |
| Investment advisers | Relied on for | Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-1, Marketing, 17 CFR 275.206(4)-1; SEC Release IA-5653, December 2020 (sec.gov/files/rules/final/2020/ia-5653.pdf) | Advertisements, promoters, compensated endorsements, written agreements | 12 14 |
| SEC, Investment Adviser Marketing — Small Entity Compliance Guide (sec.gov/resources-small-businesses/small-business-compliance-guides/investment-adviser-marketing) | The $1,000 de minimis exception; promoter disclosure and oversight | 14 |
| Advisers Act Rule 204-2, Books and Records, 17 CFR 275.204-2 | Retention of written communications, texts included | 12 |
| Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-7, Compliance Programs, 17 CFR 275.206(4)-7 | Policies and procedures that extend to service providers | 07 11 |
| SEC Division of Examinations, Fiscal Year 2026 Examination Priorities (sec.gov/files/2026-exam-priorities.pdf) | Exam focus on AI use, vendor oversight, Regulation S-P and S-ID | 09 11 |
| SEC withdrawal of proposed rules, effective June 17, 2025, incl. predictive data analytics and adviser outsourcing proposals (sec.gov/rules-regulations/2025/06/s7-12-23) | Why no AI-specific SEC rule applies, and existing rules govern instead | 12 |
| NASAA, Investment Adviser Guide; Texas State Securities Board solicitor guidance (nasaa.org · ssb.texas.gov) | State registration treatment of paid solicitors | 14 |
| Telemarketing and email | Relied on for | Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227 (law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/227) | Consent for marketing texts and calls; statutory damages; sender liability | 13 |
| FCC rules, 47 CFR 64.1200 | Prior express written consent, Do Not Call, quiet hours, revocation of consent | 13 |
| Telemarketing Sales Rule, 16 CFR Part 310 | Established business relationship: 18 months after a transaction, 3 months after an inquiry | 13 |
| National Do Not Call Registry; FCC Reassigned Numbers Database (donotcall.gov · reassigned.us) | The two checks run before any number is contacted | 13 |
| Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid, 592 U.S. 395 (2021) | Scope of the federal autodialer definition | 13 |
| Insurance Marketing Coalition v. FCC (11th Cir., January 24, 2025) | Vacatur of the FCC’s one-to-one consent rule | 13 |
| McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corp. (U.S. Supreme Court, June 2025) | Courts are not bound by FCC interpretations of the TCPA | 13 18 |
| Florida Telephone Solicitation Act, Fla. Stat. 501.059; Texas SB 140 (2025), Tex. Bus. & Com. Code ch. 302 | State rules that treat texts as solicitation, applied by the lead’s state | 13 |
| CAN-SPAM Act, 15 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.; FTC compliance guide (ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business) | Unsubscribe within 10 business days, physical address, accurate headers | 13 |
| De-identification and AI | Relied on for | Sections |
|---|---|---|
| NIST IR 8053, De-Identification of Personal Information, 2015 (nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2015/NIST.IR.8053.pdf) | Quasi-identifiers, re-identification risk, why pseudonymization is reversible | 08 09 |
| NIST SP 800-188, De-Identifying Government Datasets, 2023 (csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/188/final) | Generalization of figures into bands; de-identification as risk reduction | 08 09 |
| NIST SP 800-122, Guide to Protecting the Confidentiality of PII, 2010 (csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/122/final) | Classifying which fields are identifying and how sensitive each is | 08 |
| Anthropic, Commercial Terms of Service (anthropic.com/legal/commercial-terms) | No training on commercial API inputs and outputs by default | 09 15 |
18
Limits
What this document is not
- 01Not legal advice — Your Chief Compliance Officer and counsel decide how these rules apply to your firm. This document tells them what we do so they can.
- 02Not a SOC 2 report — We do not hold a SOC 2 attestation. We complete your due diligence questionnaire and provide the policies and evidence behind each control instead.
- 03Not a registered firm — Tez I Solutions is not a broker-dealer or investment adviser, does not give investment advice, and does not solicit securities transactions.
- 04Not permanent — Current as of October 2026. Rules in this area are moving — the FCC’s consent revocation rules among them. We review this document at least once a year and whenever a rule it relies on changes.
- 05Not a promise of results — A score says which prospects to contact first, not who will book. Until your firm’s own outcomes are recorded, the odds behind it are estimates drawn from your team’s experience.
Part 2
AI services
How we handle your data inside your AI tools.
AI services puts a standing AI engineer across the AI tools your business already pays for — ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini and the AI inside the software you use. We connect those tools to your CRM, inbox, calendar and files, build the workflows that do the repeat work, set up your processes and brand voice inside them, train your team, and look after the accounts. The tools stay yours, under your own contracts with each vendor. That changes how data protection works. In lead reactivation we keep names and contact details away from the AI provider by design. Here, a tool connected to your CRM will see the records it needs to do its job, names included. So the protections in this document are about something else: whose account it is, what each connection can reach, what the vendor's terms allow, who approves a workflow before it goes live, and how our access ends. Sections A1 to A6 are the same for every business we work with. Your industry's page adds sections A7 and A8: what your industry's rules mean for your AI tools, and where those rules come from.
A1
Commitments
Ten commitments, before the detail
- 01 · Your accounts, on business terms — We work only in accounts your business owns, on business plans. Never in a personal or consumer account — ours, yours or an employee's.
- 02 · A named user, never a shared password — You add us as a named user with our own sign-in and multi-factor authentication. We never ask for a shared password, and you should never send one to us by email.
- 03 · The least access that does the job — Each connection reaches only the data its workflow needs. Admin rights are used for set-up tasks, logged, and reduced afterwards.
- 04 · Nothing goes live without your approval — Every connection, workflow and set of instructions is approved by you, in writing, before it is switched on. So is every change to one that is already running.
- 05 · Automated where it is routine, a person in the loop where it is not — Routine, rule-based work can run on its own once you have approved it: sorting and tagging, summaries for your team, filing, and fixed-wording notices such as an appointment reminder from a template you signed off. Anything that needs a decision or a judgement — a reply written for a particular customer, a price, a term, a commitment, or anything your industry's page marks for review — has a person on your side in the loop before it goes anywhere. Each workflow's data sheet (A3) states which kind it is. Where your industry's page requires a person to review every customer message, that rule applies instead.
- 06 · Your data stays in your tools — We build and test inside your workspace. We do not copy your business data into Tez's own AI accounts. Where we need examples outside your tools, we use made-up records.
- 07 · Your data serves your business only — No reuse across clients, no sale, no training of anything by us. Prompts, instructions and workflows built from your material are yours and are not reused for anyone else.
- 08 · Vendor data settings confirmed in writing — During onboarding we read each tool's current data terms, set its controls with you, and give you a written record. We re-check it whenever a vendor changes its terms.
- 09 · Incident notice within 72 hours — As soon as possible and no later than 72 hours, or sooner where your industry's page says so.
- 10 · Access removed, everything handed over — At the end, our access is removed, every credential we created is revoked or rotated, and every workflow is documented and handed over. We confirm it in writing within 30 days.
Evidence on request: every control in this document has a record you can inspect, listed in section A5. If you send us a security questionnaire, we complete it during onboarding.
A2
Accounts and access
Whose accounts, and how we get in
The AI tools, the systems they connect to and the accounts that run them all belong to your business. We are given access to them; we never hold them. That is what makes the work portable: if we part ways, everything keeps running and nothing has to be moved out of our name.
Nothing in this section starts before you have decided to work with us. The first session is a conversation. We do not ask for logins, exports or files beforehand.
Who owns what
| Item | Who owns it | How we handle it |
|---|---|---|
| AI subscriptions and workspaces | Your business — in its name, on its payment method | We administer them for you. If a new tool would genuinely pay for itself, we say so and why, and it goes on your account, not ours. |
| The owner or super-admin role | Your business keeps it, with at least one person on your side who is not us | We take the lowest role that does the work. Admin rights for a set-up task are logged and reduced when the task is done. |
| Our sign-in | A named user for each Tez person, in your directory or invited as a guest | Multi-factor authentication on. No shared logins. Never a password by email, text or chat. |
| Connections — API keys, app authorisations, service accounts | Created in your accounts, owned by you | Each one is named, listed in the access record (A5), scoped to its workflow, and stored where you control it — never pasted into a document or a message. |
| Personal and consumer AI accounts | Their owners | Not used for business work. If the audit finds business work in personal accounts, we tell you and recommend moving it to business seats. We never connect your systems to a personal account. |
How access is set up
- 01 · You decide what we need — We list the systems and the role each one needs, and why. You agree or strike items out.
- 02 · You add us — Usually by adding us as a user, on a call where we walk through it together. A password is never sent.
- 03 · We confirm the safeguards — Multi-factor authentication on, role as agreed, sign-in recorded in the access record.
- 04 · Reviewed every quarter — We go through the access record with you and remove anything no longer needed.
- 05 · Removed at the end — Section A5 sets out how access ends.
Roles
| Obligation | Your business | Tez I Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts with AI vendors | Holds them; the vendor processes your data under them | Reads the data terms and records them for you (A4) |
| Who on your team uses which tool | Decides | Sets up the seats and permissions you decide |
| Approval of workflows and changes | Approves before anything goes live | Proposes, documents and builds; never switches on without approval |
| Review of customer-facing output | Your people review before sending | Builds the review step into the workflow |
| Industry rules — licensing, records, supervision, privacy notices | Owns them | Builds to them as set out on your industry's page (A7) |
| Security of the access we hold | Oversees | Operates the controls in A5 |
| Notice to customers or regulators after an incident | Decides | Tells you within 72 hours and supports the investigation |
| Privacy requests from your customers | Receives and instructs | Helps find and remove the data in the tools we set up, within your deadline |
Where a state privacy law reaches your business, we act as your service provider or processor for the access we hold, and the agreement says so.
A3
What the tools can see
Connections, scopes, and what stays out
An AI tool connected to one of your systems can see whatever that connection lets it see. An assistant that searches your files can surface anything the person using it is allowed to open — Microsoft says of its own Copilot that it "only surfaces organizational data to which individual users have at least view permissions." So the work starts with permissions, not prompts.
Before anything is connected
- Who can see what — Before an assistant is pointed at a shared drive, inbox or CRM, we review who can open what. Folders that are open to everyone but should not be are fixed first, with your approval.
- One data sheet per workflow — Every workflow gets a written sheet: what it reads, what it writes, who sees the result, and where a person reviews it. You approve the sheet before we build.
- Add-ons are vendors too — A plug-in, connector, custom GPT or agent from a third party is another company handling your data. None is installed without your approval and a record of its data terms.
What a data sheet looks like
Illustration — not real client data.
| Workflow | Reads | Writes | Who sees the result | Human in the loop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morning summary of new inquiries | CRM records created in the last 24 hours: name, source, service asked about, notes | One summary in the office manager's inbox | Office manager | Read before anyone acts on it |
| First-draft reply to a quote request | The single inquiry being answered; your approved reply templates and brand voice | A draft in the shared inbox — never sent | The person replying | Edited and sent by a person |
| Meeting notes to CRM | The transcript of a meeting the attendees agreed to record | A note on the matching CRM record | The account owner | Checked before it is saved |
What stays out by default
Unless your written decision says otherwise, after we have shown you what the vendor's terms and your industry's rules say, these are kept out of every prompt, instruction file and connection:
- Social Security numbers, tax IDs, driver's licence and other government ID numbers
- Full bank account and card numbers
- Passwords, access codes, gate, door and alarm codes
- Health information
- Anything your industry's page (A7) marks as restricted
Where a connection would expose one of these — a folder of scanned IDs, a CRM field holding card numbers — the connection is narrowed to leave it out, or not built.
Before a workflow goes live
| Check | What has to be true |
|---|---|
| Data sheet | Approved by you, in writing |
| Access | The connection reaches only what the sheet lists |
| Test | Run on made-up records, or on a small set of real ones you choose, with the results shown to you |
| Human in the loop | Marked on the data sheet. In place wherever a decision or judgement is involved: a reply written for a particular customer, a price or a term, or anything your industry's page marks for review. Routine, rule-based steps you have approved may run without one |
| Owner | A named person on your side who can pause it |
| Documentation | Written up and stored where you keep it |
AI tools make mistakes. Every workflow is built on the assumption that a draft can be wrong, which is why the review step is part of the design rather than a suggestion.
A4
Model providers and training
What the vendors do with your data, and how we check
When your team or a workflow uses ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot or Gemini, the vendor processes that data under its contract with your business. Tez is not a reseller or partner of any AI vendor, and not a party to those contracts. Whether a vendor trains its models on your data, how long it keeps prompts, whether its staff can review them, and where it processes them are set by the vendor's terms and by the plan you are on. Those terms change. So we do not promise what a vendor will do. We promise what we will do.
What we do
- 01 · List every tool — Each AI tool and AI feature you pay for, the plan it is on, and who holds a seat.
- 02 · Read the current terms — For each one we record what the vendor says about training on your data, retention, human review, where data is processed, and which admin controls exist. Each entry carries the date and the address of the page we read.
- 03 · Set the controls with you — Where a tool offers a choice — training opt-outs, retention periods, chat history, which add-ons are allowed — we recommend the most protective setting that still does what you need, and you decide.
- 04 · Give you the record — The settings record is yours, in writing. Your compliance contact can file it with your vendor reviews.
- 05 · Re-check when terms change — When a vendor changes its data terms, we re-read them, update the record and tell you if anything moved. We also re-check the whole record at least every six months.
What the main vendors said when we checked
Read on each vendor's own page on 6 October 2026. This is the vendor's statement to its customers, not a commitment by Tez. If it changes, the vendor's current terms govern, and we update your record.
| Vendor | What its page said | Where |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic — Claude, under its Commercial Terms | "Anthropic may not train models on Customer Content from Services." The Commercial Terms cover Anthropic's API and the business offerings that reference them, not its consumer plans. Effective June 17, 2025. | anthropic.com/legal/commercial-terms |
| OpenAI — API | Data sent to the API is not used to train or improve OpenAI's models unless you opt in, as of March 1, 2023. Abuse-monitoring logs are kept for up to 30 days by default. | developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/your-data |
| OpenAI — ChatGPT business plans | Read during onboarding against OpenAI's published terms for your plan, and recorded the same way. | openai.com/enterprise-privacy |
| Microsoft — Copilot | "Prompts, responses, and data accessed through Microsoft Graph aren't used to train foundation LLMs." Copilot only surfaces data a user already has permission to view. | learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/copilot/microsoft-365-copilot-privacy |
| Google — Gemini in Google Workspace | Your content "is not human reviewed or otherwise used for Generative AI model training outside your domain without permission." | knowledge.workspace.google.com/admin/gemini/generative-ai-in-google-workspace-privacy-hub |
| AI inside your other software | Each vendor's own terms — your CRM, phone system or accounting software. Recorded the same way during onboarding. | Each vendor's data or AI terms page |
Consumer plans and personal accounts
Consumer plans run on different terms from business plans — Anthropic's Commercial Terms, for one, state that they do not cover its consumer offerings. We do not do business work in consumer or personal accounts, and we do not rely on a consumer plan's settings to protect business data.
Our own tools
We use AI tools of our own to write code and documentation. Your business data does not go into them. Anything we build for you is built and tested in your workspace, or against made-up records.
A5
Records, security and incidents
What we keep, how it is protected, and what happens if something fails
Records you can inspect
Records describe what we built and changed. They live in a location your business owns, and they do not contain your customers' data.
| Record | What it holds |
|---|---|
| Access record | Every Tez sign-in and every connection we created: system, role or scope, date added, date reviewed, date removed |
| Settings record | Each tool's plan, data terms as read on a given date, and the controls set (A4) |
| Workflow register | Every live workflow, with its approved data sheet (A3), its owner on your side and its documentation |
| Change log | Every change to a live workflow or connection: what changed, why, when, who approved it |
| Training record | Who was trained, on which tools and processes, and when |
Changes to something already running
Every change to a live workflow is described, approved by you, tested, logged and reversible — the previous version is kept. If a vendor update breaks a workflow, or a workflow starts doing something it should not, we may pause it at once to stop harm, and tell you the same day. We do not change what a workflow does without your approval.
Security controls
| Control | Evidence you can ask for |
|---|---|
| Written information security program, modelled on Massachusetts 201 CMR 17.00 | The program document |
| Multi-factor authentication on every account we use to reach your systems | Access record |
| Access limited to named individuals, reviewed with you quarterly | Access record and review log |
| Tez devices: full-disk encryption, screen lock, current patches, endpoint protection | Configuration record |
| Your data is not stored on Tez devices or in our cloud storage; where a task needs a file locally, it is deleted when the task ends | Written procedure |
| Background check for anyone with access, on your request | Written confirmation |
| Cyber liability insurance, where your contract requires it | Certificate of insurance |
| Written incident response plan, reviewed each year | The plan and its last review |
If something goes wrong
An incident includes a workflow sending or showing data to the wrong person, a connection reaching more than its sheet allows, a suspected compromise of a Tez sign-in, and a vendor incident we learn of that affects your workspace.
- 01 · Contain — Pause the workflow, revoke the affected credential or connection, and stop the exposure.
- 02 · Notify you within 72 hours at the latest — Which systems and data, what window, what we have done. Sooner where your industry's page sets a shorter time. Updates follow as we investigate.
- 03 · Preserve evidence — Logs, the change log and the vendor's audit records are kept intact for your investigation.
- 04 · Support your notice, never pre-empt it — Whether customers or regulators are told is your decision. We never contact your customers about it. A vendor's own incident notice comes to you under your contract with that vendor.
When the engagement ends
| Step | What happens |
|---|---|
| Access removed | Every Tez user and role removed from every system, checked against the access record |
| Credentials ended | Every key, app authorisation and service account we created is revoked, or rotated and handed to you |
| Nothing in our name | Anything that ended up in a Tez name is transferred to you first — by design there should be nothing |
| Handover pack | The workflow register, data sheets, settings record, change log and plain-English run notes, so your team or the next provider can keep it running |
| Written confirmation | Within 30 days of the end of the engagement |
Everything we build is yours — documented and portable. If we part ways, it keeps working and your team knows how it runs.
A6
Limits
What this document is not
- 01 · Not legal advice — Your counsel or compliance officer decides how your industry's rules apply to your business. This document tells them what we do so they can.
- 02 · Not a SOC 2 report — We do not hold a SOC 2 attestation. If you send a security questionnaire, we complete it and provide the policies and evidence behind each control instead.
- 03 · Not the vendor — We do not run the AI vendors' systems or set their terms. Their security, retention, outages and incidents are governed by your contract with them. We are not a reseller, partner or certified provider of any AI vendor.
- 04 · Your obligations stay yours — Using AI tools does not move your duties to us: licensing, supervision, record keeping, privacy notices and your staff's use of AI remain your business's responsibility. We build to them, as your industry's page sets out.
- 05 · Not a promise about AI output — AI tools can be wrong, and confidently so. That is why anything that needs a judgement has a person in the loop, and why no workflow makes a decision your business would otherwise make.
- 06 · Not permanent — Current as of October 2026. Vendor terms and the rules on AI change often. We review this document at least once a year, and whenever a vendor term or rule it relies on changes.
A7
Financial advisory
What your industry's rules mean for your AI tools
No rule written for AI binds a broker-dealer or investment adviser today. The SEC withdrew its AI proposal in June 2025 [8], and FINRA has said its existing rules apply whether a firm builds an AI tool or uses a vendor's [5]. That makes the familiar rules the standard: Regulation S-P for customer information, supervision and approval for communications, and books and records for everything sent. Each one reaches AI tools directly. These are the rules, and what we do about each.
| Rule | What it means for AI tools | How we handle it |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation S-P, as amended in 2024 [1][2] | Every AI vendor and every outside engineer that can reach customer information is a service provider your firm must oversee. The amended rule requires your firm to make sure service providers notify it of a breach within 72 hours. Prospects who never opened an account are still consumers under the rule. | Incident notice to you within 72 hours, in our agreement. The settings record and access record (A4, A5) are written for your vendor oversight file. We inventory every AI tool that can reach customer information, including ones staff added themselves. |
| Regulation S-P, 248.11 and 248.13 [1] | Customer information shared with a service provider may be used only for the contracted purpose. | Our use is limited to your engagement, in writing. We record whether each AI vendor's terms allow it to use your data for anything else, and set the controls with you. |
| Regulation S-ID [1] | Identity theft red flags. An AI tool that drafts outreach or answers clients must never ask someone to confirm account or personal details. | Drafts never request account numbers, dates of birth or verification details. Account-specific questions are routed to a person. |
| FINRA Rules 2210 and 3110; FINRA Notice 24-09 [3][4][5] | An AI-drafted message is still your firm's communication. Templates used with more than 25 retail investors in 30 days need principal approval before use; correspondence is reviewed under your supervisory procedures. | Every customer-facing draft is reviewed by a person at your firm. Templates go to your principal before use. No workflow sends to clients without review. |
| Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-1, the Marketing Rule [6] | Outreach offering advisory services may be an advertisement. AI tools add performance figures, projections and testimonial-style lines freely. | Brand-voice instructions bar performance figures, projections, testimonials and guarantees. Your CCO classifies and approves each template. |
| Exchange Act Rule 17a-4, FINRA Rule 4511, Advisers Act Rule 204-2 [7] | Business communications must be preserved in your archive. A message an AI workflow sends from a channel your archive does not capture is an off-channel record. | Workflows send, if at all, only through channels your archive already captures. AI notetakers and chat assistants are set up so that anything your CCO treats as a record lands where your archive can keep it. |
| FINRA Notice 21-29; Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-7 [9][10] | Outsourcing a function does not outsource responsibility. Your compliance program has to cover vendors — including how vendors themselves use AI. | We complete your due diligence questionnaire, say which AI tools we ourselves use (A4), and confirm that your data does not go into them. |
| State privacy laws narrowing the GLBA exemption [11] | Data outside the federal exemption — and in some states, more — can carry state access and deletion rights. | We help locate and remove that data in the tools we set up, within your deadline. |
In practice
- A workflow may draft a meeting follow-up for an advisor to edit and send through your archived email. It does not send on its own, and it never includes performance figures or a recommendation.
- An assistant may answer staff questions from your written policies and procedures. It is not given access to custodian data or account statements unless your CCO approves that scope in writing.
- An AI notetaker is switched on only for meetings your firm has decided to record, and its notes are kept where your archive can preserve them.
- During onboarding we check for AI tools staff are using on client data without approval, and list them for your CCO.
A8
Sources
Where these rules come from
1. Regulation S-P and Regulation S-ID, 17 CFR Part 248 — https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-17/chapter-II/part-248 2. SEC Release 34-100155, Regulation S-P amendments, May 2024 — https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2024/34-100155.pdf · SEC, Regulation S-P Small Entity Compliance Guide — https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2024/regulation-s-p-small-entity-compliance-guide.pdf 3. FINRA Rule 2210, Communications with the Public — https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/2210 4. FINRA Rule 3110, Supervision — https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/3110 5. FINRA Regulatory Notice 24-09, Generative AI — https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/24-09 6. Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-1; SEC Release IA-5653 — https://www.sec.gov/files/rules/final/2020/ia-5653.pdf 7. FINRA Rule 4511 and Exchange Act Rule 17a-4 — https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/4511 8. SEC withdrawal of proposed rules, effective June 17, 2025 — https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/2025/06/s7-12-23 9. FINRA Regulatory Notice 21-29, Vendor Management and Outsourcing — https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/21-29
- 01FINRA, 2026 Annual Regulatory Oversight Report — https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/2025-12/2026-annual-regulatory-oversight-report.pdf · SEC Division of Examinations, Fiscal Year 2026 Examination Priorities — https://www.sec.gov/files/2026-exam-priorities.pdf
- 02Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. 6801–6809 — https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-94